Promote Seniority?

Continental Airlines will be the first US carrier to receive delivery of the new Boeing 787 aircraft.  The plane is regarded as the best choice for airlines looking to fly long-distance routes and reap the benefits of an energy efficient design.  It is the newest toy for a commercial pilot and everyone wants a chance to fly it.  How does the airline handle the interest from its pilots?  Continental gives priority to the most senior pilots.  Those who have the most time with the company get first option to participate in an extensive training program and then be available to fly the planes as they are introduced into Continental’s fleet.  Sounds like a respectable system.  A Wall Street Journal article mentions one potential downside to the approach.  The most senior pilots are likely to retire in the immediate future.  It raises an intriguing question.  Should an enterprise invest the most in those who are about to reach the end of their service?  In the commercial airline industry, this date-certain is age 65.  The article mentions that Continental has budgeted for the quick rotation expected from their first group of senior pilots.  From the perspective of building an engaging and supportive workplace the philosophy of rewarding those who have given the most seems equitable and completely fair.  From a budgetary and resource allocation standpoint, would it not seem more appropriate to invest training in less senior pilot and therefore ensure a tenure of service and learning that should result in limited turnover?


The idea of training, promotion, and retirement makes me consider the trends in the social sector.  How often are the highest positions in leadership held by those who are most senior in the cause?  How many Board Chairs will retire from the board after their term as President expires?  Do organizations consider the make-up of the leadership or is seniority given the most weight when selecting leaders?  What investments could you make in a new board member who shows promise of leadership that you may not be able to make in the individual who is about to depart?  If the phrase, “it is his/her turn next” enters your leadership nomination process then perhaps it is time to discuss alternative models.  Seniority is an important attribute but it should not be equated directly with leadership.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s