Flying model airplanes is a passion for hobbyists. It is done on a scale that allows for smaller aircraft, and shorter runways and requires less restricted airspace. But it requires some of the regulations and precautions of a real airport.
Which parts of our work are performed on a smaller scale but still require attention to details that may not be obvious? How do we embed our values into each portion of our work, regardless if it is a mainstage or a pop-up performance?
If you are committed to the journey, you are willing to get your shoes wet. It is a simple test early in an expedition.
The smoke from the wildfires cleared in our region for a day. I went for a long trail run and at the first water crossing, I waded through the river and prepared to continue my run. A group of hikers inquired if there was a crossing that did not require wading across the river. I said I was unaware of any immediate down trees that formed natural bridges or rocks that allowed for hopping across. Despite my reassurance that the alpine lake they had selected as a destination was remarkable and the water was not cold, they turned around and proceeded back to the trailhead. I was committed to my journey, thinking it was enhanced by the dozen stream crossings. They were committed to keeping their feet dry. A river crossing served as the barrier to entry.
From a blinding snowstorm to a precision landing. Just because the real-time environment creates uncertainty does not mean the journey should be abandoned. A disappointing event, a missed donation, a strategic uncertainty, a departing staff member, or a change in membership does not mean that a dip is a permanent descent. How might we keep perspective, even when outside influences contribute to feelings of doubt?
What-if-concepts 