Behavior

New Start

Has a fresh start completely changed your mindset and the outcomes surrounding your actions? Head out on a bike ride with a rear tire that shows signs of significant wear, and we get a flat tire immediately; it can feel deflating (pun intended). Returning to the starting point, we change the tire and tube to place the wheel back in functional condition. We head off with greater certainty that our ride will be free from mechanical failures. Our mindset can focus on the activity of riding instead of the fifty-fifty chance our tire will not survive the ride.

Fresh starts are magical; they do not take up a lot of energy to alter our mindset. How might we use a new calendar year to reset our patterns, assumptions, and behaviors? What might we focus on when we remove some of the most prominent distractions?

Repetitive Behaviors

What repetitive behaviors are paramount to your enterprise’s success? Which repetitive behaviors block your team’s progress? Which provide opportunities to amplify or reduce, and which ones appear fixed?

In John Green’s book The Anthropocene Reviewed, there is a chapter entitled ‘Wintry Mix.’ In the narrative, he communicates his struggle to maintain a vegetable garden and discourage the local groundhog, who forages freely from his plot. Eventually, he plants a separate garden for the groundhog, allowing John to maintain his passion project and reduce the groundhog’s desire to use it like a sample at Costco.

The groundhog’s repetitive behavior was eating from a garden. It would not switch tactics unless relocated or eliminated; neither was an option for John. So, a compromise was reached, allowing the author and groundhog to continue their passions with significantly reduced friction.

How might we assess our repetitive actions with sobriety? How might we embrace those that serve us, try to isolate those that foil our progress, and remain open to new mindsets?

Rue Goldberg vs Planning

Rue Goldberg machines blend engineering, creativity, and autonomy. Designing and building a contraption is an art form. It requires the ability to trial scenarios and use objects in innovative ways. Watching the finished product in action can feel anticlimactic since we anticipate all the obstacles have been removed.

It occurs to me that some groups committed to strategic planning view their process as assembling a Rue Goldberg. They intend to design an elaborate apparatus, commit to a period of trial and error, and then reach a state of predictability where initiating a single event at the start will reach a desired ending. While relying on ingenuity and being flexible in deploying everyday initiatives are consistent with many planning efforts, the controlled environment is unrealistic. Obstacles are what divide planning and acting. We can always reach for tomorrow but only have today to shape the behaviors and processes that will impact our trajectory.

How might we remain flexible as we activate our plan on a daily basis? How might we recognize our plan is at best an outline, if not just some scribbled notes in the margin? How might we embrace the unanticipated instead of building elaborate set pieces to avoid disruption?

Glorious Strategy vs Inaction

What is it like to review an exceptional strategy statement with promises for a balanced company culture that toggles between engaged work time and generative problem-solving? Is it idyllic? However, the actionable work plan is focused only on production, and all the supporting metrics are output-based. 

Like an athlete, our performance trends towards our practice routine. If we pledge board engagement but proceed for months without sending updates except to prod for more donations, we are not going to build an involved group. We might instill some behaviors worthy of a bank ATM.

How might our behaviors match our strategies and values? The most impactful starting point is in real-time. Do something immediately that connects behavior and the goal. We can write down the most glorious intentions, but how we act is more reflective of where we are heading.

For entertainment value, Chatgpt created the following misaligned example:

Vision Statement: To create a harmonious and prosperous society where every individual thrives in a world of abundance, equity, and sustainable development.

Mission Statement: Empower people and communities through innovative and compassionate solutions, fostering a culture of collaboration, inclusivity, and environmental stewardship.

Goals:

  1. Universal Well-being:
    • Ensure access to quality healthcare, education, and basic necessities for all.
    • Promote mental and emotional well-being through community support systems.
  2. Environmental Sustainability:
    • Achieve net-zero carbon emissions.
    • Promote conservation and sustainable use of natural resources.
  3. Inclusive Economy:
    • Establish an equitable economic system that eliminates poverty and provides equal opportunities for growth.
    • Encourage local, sustainable businesses to thrive.
  4. Global Unity:
    • Foster international collaboration and understanding.
    • Work towards the elimination of borders and the establishment of a unified global community.
  5. Technological Advancement for Humanity:
    • Develop and use technology for the betterment of society, ensuring ethical use and accessibility for all.

Work Plan:

While the strategic plan outlines a utopian vision, the work plan deviates from the idealistic goals.

  1. Production Metrics Focus:
    • Prioritize economic growth over social well-being.
    • Emphasize production metrics without considering environmental impact or resource depletion.
  2. Wealth Concentration:
    • Encourage wealth accumulation among a select few, leading to income inequality.
    • Neglect social safety nets and public services in favor of economic gains.
  3. Nationalistic Policies:
    • Adopt isolationist and nationalistic policies, hindering international collaboration and unity.
    • Promote protectionism, leading to unequal global development.
  4. Technological Disparity:
    • Develop and deploy technology without considering its ethical implications.
    • Allow technological advancements to exacerbate societal divisions rather than fostering inclusivity.
  5. Short-Term Profit Maximization:
    • Prioritize short-term economic gains at the expense of long-term sustainability.
    • Disregard the environmental impact of production processes.

Alignment Adjustment: To realign the work plan with the utopian goals, it is crucial to:

  • Integrate ethical considerations into production metrics.
  • Promote wealth distribution and prioritize social welfare over economic gains.
  • Embrace international collaboration and cooperation for global progress.
  • Ensure technology is developed and used responsibly, considering its impact on society and the environment.
  • Prioritize long-term sustainability and environmental stewardship in all decision-making processes.