Promoting conversation is not our highest decision-making achievement, rather curating a remarkable process is the goal. How do we enhance meaningful dialogue empowered by individual perspectives? What is the result of our current conversation ritual? Do we create a culture of inquiry and seek out the dark corners? Or do we defer to the convenience of routine?
John’s talk identifies three beliefs that hinder powerful conversation:
Dissent equals disloyalty
Criticism of an idea does equals criticism on and individual
Disagreement with consensus equals not being a team player
What if we insisted on a dynamic process and bold conversations before making remarkable decisions?