The mountain glacier used to occupy this location in the 1800s. Today, you have to travel more than 3 kilometers (almost 2 miles) up the valley to view the glacier, and even then, you are not at the glacier’s terminal moraine. We are so keen to measure progress but are reticent to monitor regression. What does regression tell us? It might be the most crucial narrative we can explore.
Safety barriers can be seen as inconvenient and unnecessary. When they appear placed too far away from the object we intend to observe, it is easy to ignore their presence. What we do not know is the magnitude of the potential hazards ahead. We are rarely the experts and yet we consider our mastery of conventional wisdom to be all the safety we need.
If we are ready to embrace edgecraft, we must understand that traveling beyond edges has consequences. How do you evaluate warning signs and the potential benefits of navigating beyond the barrier?
If we shine the brightest light on our area of focus, it washes out the details. However, allowing light to appear from different directions and shadows to drift in might reveal features and understanding that we did not previously possess.
What would be your first step if you had an open travel lane unhindered by resource limits? It is not often we get an unmitigated opportunity. So, what would you do?
Our worldview is informed by our surroundings and environment. We might be so close to the lens that frames our interpretation that it is not perceived. How do we account for the filters that define our focus?
Ice climbing is best attempted with ice axes, crampons, harness, rope, ice screws, helmet, and appropriate clothing. Assembling the right gear can make a difference between a successful outing and an epic failure.
What special tools does your enterprise possess that amplify the impact of your work? What equipment are you missing that might elevate your work? What resources do you not even know you should be using? Who might help guide your equipment procurement process?
A sample of school test questions listed online demonstrates that even those responsible for creating tests (exams) can get the answers wrong. It reminds us that despite implied and/or earned expert status, the knowledge/process source might be wrong.
Who are the authority figures that your enterprise relies on as sources of information, resources, funds, and/or accreditation? What happens when they provide incorrect information and/or make the erroneous assumptions? How has your team responded? What lessons have been learned? Is it an anecdote still being discussed, has the organization moved on, or was it catastrophic?
After yesterday’s post about ‘Starting at Speed,’ let’s move to finishing. I knew a competitor who claimed they never lost a sprint in the last 100 yards of 10-kilometer running races. They were unstoppable. The irony is that they ran the first 9.9 kilometers (6.1 miles) conservatively so they could excel in the finishing stretch. Without pushing themselves, they were more of a specialist, competing against athletes they should have beaten by some distance.
Finishing fast is memorable, but we will never achieve a personal record for the entire course if we only hit our race pace in the finishing straight. If an enterprise throws the best parties when it reaches the goal, but the completion date is months or years behind schedule, does it carry the same weight?
Finishing is follow-through on all the efforts that took place prior. If you seek finish line fame, it is the equivalent of helicoptering to the summit and posing for pictures. There is little honor in not navigating the terrain that precedes the mountain top.
How might we use our skills and endurance over the entire course? Or, how might we sign up for events that attract specialists who can race on equal terms?
The ski area at St. Moritz, Switzerland has one of the steepest starts for a World Cup Downhill race. See a world cup racer in action here.
A fast start is a sensational experience, but we best be ready for what comes next. If we wander out of the start gate haphazardly, we will likely crash or go off course before we reach the first technical element. If we want to be fast at launch, we better do the work that matters in advance and have the right mindset. Otherwise, a more serene start might serve us better or we should consider delaying the commencement of our efforts.
If you take a paper bag and aim a hair dryer towards its open end, the bag’s kinetic energy is released and assumes flight. A bag is an excellent option if we need to hold some produce, and a hair dryer is perfect if we need to dry our hair after a shower. When we pair them together, we get a dramatic result, which may or may not reveal the most productive use of both instruments.
When odd pairings work, they are sensational but can also fail us. Iterating in the design studio is an excellent option if we are willing to go on the adventure and open to uncertain outcomes. If we need a sure thing, we might hedge towards the predictable.
Booking two artists/authors/scientists/athletes to interview each other might be an insightful option. However, they might speak an insider language that is hard for the audience to access. A good interviewer can ask questions that help decode the artist’s superpower without abandoning the audience.
A hair dryer chasing a paper bag around a stage might be the pinnacle of performance art. But we must accurately represent the performance so our audience can live on the edge.
What-if-concepts 