What was deemed entirely safe changed with more knowledge and time? What new information has transformed your understanding of reality? What everyday activities from your youth now make you reconsider adult oversight? How might we build in the ability to adapt and amend as new details reveal themselves?
A little more detail on the home Atomic Energy Lab.
What if your planning starts from the end? What if you reverse engineer from the finish line? How might it change your mindset and alter priorities? How might our investments of resources alter if our strategy works from a different perspective?
A sample of school test questions listed online demonstrates that even those responsible for creating tests (exams) can get the answers wrong. It reminds us that despite implied and/or earned expert status, the knowledge/process source might be wrong.
Who are the authority figures that your enterprise relies on as sources of information, resources, funds, and/or accreditation? What happens when they provide incorrect information and/or make the erroneous assumptions? How has your team responded? What lessons have been learned? Is it an anecdote still being discussed, has the organization moved on, or was it catastrophic?
Light is considered essential. However, shadows provide depth and dimension to our work. If we capture our creation with the right balance of light and shade, we might add appreciation and better comprehension of our efforts.
If we build on a fault line, expect dynamic experiences. If we desire stability, we may need to seek more durable ground. Flying into my city earlier this year, I spoke with my seatmate who worked as a facility manager, building served farmers (data centers). He was overseeing the construction of a new center outside the town. I asked him why his company picked this location, and he stated that it met four critical criteria: geologically stable land (i.e., limited seismic activity), a good source of inexpensive power (hydro and wind), less expensive land, and the cost to build was attractive. The exact property would not work well as a prospective site for a geothermal pool or a national park that contained geysers.
Where we work may influence our impact and ability to establish a stable foundation. A ski instructor has more prospects in the mountains than being based in the tropics. A social service organization might likely thrive in a region with an established nonprofit center and a community foundation. If your cause is a search and rescue organization, it exists on the frontier between emergency services and volunteer resources. The business model demands working in dynamic settings and functioning on fault lines.
How might we assess where our services are most needed within a community? How might we be willing to migrate if the need has relocated?
Binoculars are a liminal object to me. Most binoculars I have encountered are safely positioned in a case or sitting static on a shelf; they are more accessory than instrument. But, when required, they can transform quickly. Is that a wildfire on the ridge? Is there a vessel at sea requiring assistance? Is that an Ivory-Billed Woodpecker? Did my favorite musical artist playing in a mega stadium change into a new costume? Who walked into the building at the far end of the property?
Using them constantly makes the world myopic, and our sense of scale is unrealistic. By deploying them randomly, we spin the wheel of serendipity, hoping a worthwhile subject will appear. Treating them as a resource can enhance our culture of curiosity and provide confirmation of our interest or render the subject matter a lower priority.
What are the binoculars of your enterprise? What can your team leverage at key moments to make sense of the territory ahead?
When asking nutritionists about the best diets to follow, their answer tends to contemplate themes. They can highlight the benefits and challenges of specific diets, but they return to more prominent themes. How might we recognize that we sometimes require a specific resource to move forward, but on numerous occasions, we can progress with different forms of fuel for our journey? An ultra hiker can snack on Snicker bars, pieces of fruit, plant foods, or nothing (for limited durations), and all these forms will help them move down the trail.
What if our planning was not so rigid about meeting specific goals, except where necessary? What if we developed themes we were curious about exploring, understanding that navigating to a general vicinity of a goal might be more potent than clambering to a specific summit?
What repetitive behaviors are paramount to your enterprise’s success? Which repetitive behaviors block your team’s progress? Which provide opportunities to amplify or reduce, and which ones appear fixed?
In John Green’s book The Anthropocene Reviewed, there is a chapter entitled ‘Wintry Mix.’ In the narrative, he communicates his struggle to maintain a vegetable garden and discourage the local groundhog, who forages freely from his plot. Eventually, he plants a separate garden for the groundhog, allowing John to maintain his passion project and reduce the groundhog’s desire to use it like a sample at Costco.
The groundhog’s repetitive behavior was eating from a garden. It would not switch tactics unless relocated or eliminated; neither was an option for John. So, a compromise was reached, allowing the author and groundhog to continue their passions with significantly reduced friction.
How might we assess our repetitive actions with sobriety? How might we embrace those that serve us, try to isolate those that foil our progress, and remain open to new mindsets?
An innocuous question can solve a major airline crash investigation.
What questions do we need to ask ourselves and our team that might appear rudimentary but reveal significant barriers or opportunities? One of the best places to start is when providing orientation to new staff or board members. Their inquiry might open a new chapter for your enterprise.
Sometimes, our assignment is to follow a set course and stay within the lines. On other occasions, we are given a blank canvas to unleash our artistic abilities. The wayfinder understands the moment we occupy. Are we connecting dots or discovering new constellations?
What-if-concepts 